There was a statement in the article that made a little confused or maybe I was just not noticing it.
My confusion is based on these items:
- Conover was a 4-star QB when he was recruited.
- Last year when he did play, he seemed to understand the offense and did well.
- Everything I have read, said Conover the best backup.
In this article, it states: ‘BYU can’t afford to get caught in another jam where playing an injured quarterback is a better option than playing a healthy backup.’
I am confused about why A-Rod would think that Conover was not a viable option.