I was looking at the Santa Clara pre-game issue from the sports info folks: specifically Coach Rose’s record.
It struck me that the 2011-12 year marked a turning point, especially for defensive performance, which has led to the lower overall record imo.
I started looking for the reasons.
WCC instead of MWC
Rice gone to UNLV
Carlino instead of Jimmer
The point guard spot hasn’t been a strength since Jimmer left. Carlino was legit but eventually got largely benched because of his inconsistency. His replacement KC is consistent but not as good a PG as either Jimmer or Carlino. I’m not trying to dis KC just think he’s much more a point forward or some such hybrid. He obviously does a decent job, but he doesn’t carry the team the way Jimmer or Jax or for that matter Carlino or Fischer can. I expect that Seljaas and Emery well the future does look bright.
WCC is much more a 3 point league. and the slower of foot guard lines byu tends to carry have not done so well. MWC and other major conference bball leagues tend to more balanced play that the Rose’s players can better exploit their strengths and don’t tend to the glaring weakness on the wings. Though it was interesting to see Belmont and CMU type teams in the mix pre-conference play this year. They were of course games much like the last few years outscore or lose.
Rice hasn’t done nearly as well yet at UNLV as I expected him too. Perhaps he’s simply a stand in in my mind for the early Dave Rose staffs. I do think it is interesting that as the Dave Rose raised coaches have come to dominate the staff instead of the new blood with new ideas and ways of doing things the record has suffered. Quincy Lewis may be a new prototype. A Rose protégé whose done well elsewhere who may be able to bring in outside ideas but still has enough of a Rose varnish to fit in with the cast.
In any event Rose’s teams still haven’t risen to the level of the pre-Jimmer teams since Jimmer left. Maybe Jimmer changed Rose? Maybe the taste of success, consecutive years of wins in the big dance and the NIT deep run, legitimated his approach too much for him or some of his staff’s approach to continue the learning required for a continued upward trajectory?