That seems like a trend in coaching everywhere. Am I off on this? I have no data to support that, but it seems like a coach spends 3-5 years building a program give or take 2 years and gets it operating at a certain level then plateaus or tails off. You’d think there would be a continual slow improvement with a successful coach building equity in the program and gaining experience in his specific situation.
Do they need a new challenge to get excited about? Is it that their weaknesses are revealed and that places a ceiling on them? Is it external to the program? Less excitement, hard to sell? I have no idea.
There are obvious exceptions to this line of thinking.
Incidentally, my first thought was addinig new assistant coaches was a perfect way to rachet it up.