Harvard lost 62-46. But, Oklahoma could only get 62 points against Harvard. So, the answer for those who said Harvard’s defense wasn’t very good was wrong. Unfortunately their offense wasn’t as good as the past couple of games. Using Hawks logic and reasoning it’s because they were not as deep because the coach and players are selfish
I am inside of your head…
It’s because I am right and most of the other basketball guys here agree with me.
I should be charging rent. 
All the accounts I can find say it was 83-71.
so ou with a not atypical lon kruger offense was within one basket of what the Cougars needed an overtime for.
Harvard allowed 48 points in a single half. not exactly a stellar defensive effort. No more than allowing BYU to score 82. The biggest difference in the games was that BYU still doesn’t play defence worth spit; couldn’t stop Harvard when the game was on the line.
1 Like
You are right Harold… and Harvard led by 2 at halftime.
We all know the bottom line is that BYU could have beaten Harvard and should have if they had played a better team game, like the one they did today.
I’m not sure what Scott is doing… maybe, like me, he is suffering from some holiday stress. I know I get a little off this time of year.
Thanks for clarifying and making your point. I always enjoy your well thought out takes and opinions. You know your game…
All BYU had to do against Harvard is make 1 more free throw. Had they shot free throws like they did the past two games that would have happened. Rose is right. Can’t shoot FT, can’t play in the games.
Like I said, the game is more than a bunch of statistics. The stats only tell part of the game.
It’s called in depth analyzing… you should try it sometime.
In your case, it’s in depth opinion and nothing more 
the only real difference between my opinions and yours is that everyone else usually agrees with mine. 
This site does attract conspiracy theorists and arm chair QBs and novices. What can I say. I’m apparently one of the few experts here with an objective non-judgmental approach to all subjects
I must say, that’s the funniest thing I’ve seen since I got on the site. You an expert!!? Not by a long ways.
And you are the novice arm chair QB
It is funny… and we are all laughing. It kind of reminds me of the emperor and his new clothes except that the rest of us can all see what is going on and we are not afraid to point it out! 
Scott sits on his throne (the porcelain one) posting his expert opinions and reading basketball stat magazines, all the while make believing that he is “an expert”. 
Um…Harold is the one that brought up the stats and I’m simply supplying him and you with the real facts. Kaufusi is producing more than Austin and should play a lot more than Austin. Must be a rift or Rose is going to play those who make free throws. Last two games the players on the floor shot much better FT.
I have never claimed to be an expert. You were the one that claimed expertise.
Just because you don’t say it doesn’t mean you don’t come across like you think you are one.
You know where this road is leading, we’ve all been down it and some of us more than once.
Don’t bother going there, it’s a dead end.