In all the years I have been on Cougarfan, never once have I seen Hopper bring useful information of the site. All I ever see is Hopper disparage anyone that does not agree with him. Thawk the latest victim.
I mean, who says crap like that?
I’ve seen him run off a number of contributors because they don’t need to be insulted, so they leave. It’s just sad. So , Hopper, how about you apologize to Hawk?
So sad, so common, just how many times are these posts hijacked with petty insults.
Again, Hopper, it’s about Nacua…stick to the subject matter and leave your personal insults unsaid.
years ago, I flamed Emery, someone said, Bailey, you are above that. I apologized, not because I felt differently about Emery but because I had offended someone. When Jim has crossed the line, I have said something and every single time he has also apologized. That is what normal people do. It is a basic principal of the gospel. Do you have the ability to do that?
Again, I would have to say that most of your posts are full of argument. You may not realize it but you tend to take the opposite view point and when y ou don’t get your way, you personalize it and that is the difference between you and a normal person.
I have a standing rule in life. There are two types of people in this world. Those who unify and those who tear down or create chaos. builders are in my circle.
So, if I have an opposing view, or simply another point of view, I’m argumentative. That’s being argumentative by suggesting my view is argumentative. I rarely have different views with you. Especially in basketball. And, I often accept other’s views with additional possibilities.
So, I make a legitimate comment that in the NFL, Nacua has proven to be a good slot receiver. That doesn’t automatically mean he will be a good wide receiver. So, what does Twawk write? “Hopper hasn’t had enough attention lately so he has laid bait out to see if anyone wants to take it and engage in a senseless argument!” Then you say I’m argumentative and trying to cause an argument. How is that so?
What is wrong with debating things like can Nacua succeed at the wide receiver position because he is successful at the slot receiver? The Rams have a really good pair of fast wide receivers already. Why can others simply debate this instead of saying I’m being argumentative? Jim is at least giving reasons and examples. He could do so without argumentative snippets. But, that’s kind of what we have been doing. You now have the floor.
I’m glad you got it
Sometimes we sit on our normalcy biases and refuse to think more on issues. For instance, why would we think that playing wide receiver in college would transfer automatically to the NFL? It’s possible for Nacua to do it. But, the Rams already have speedy wide receivers. Why do Fish, Thawk and Hawks get a pass for attacking me for a simple and appropriate question?
Todd Christiansen was a bruiser runningback for BYU. The Cowboys tried to use him as a RB in the NFL. Didn’t work at that level. But, the Raiders saw him as most of us saw him as a tight end. He became one of the best TE in NFL history.